”One simple fact should worry Americans more about biological than about nuclear or chemical arms: unlike either of the other two, biological weapons combine maximum destructiveness and easy availability.” – page 32.”The 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) requires the United States to destroy its stockpile.” – page 31.”Biological weapons have received less attention than the others, but probably represent the greatest danger.” – page 30.armored battalions or ships, but it is that they might attempt to punish the United States by triggering catastrophes in American cities.” – page 30 ”The primary risk is not that enemies might lob some nuclear or chemical weapons at U.S.”Rolling along in what some see as a revolution in military affairs, American forces continue to make unmatched use of state-of-the-art weapons, surveillance and information systems, and the organizational and doctrinal flexibility for managing the integration of these complex innovations into ‘systems of systems’ that is the key to modern military effectiveness.” – page 28.American activism to guarantee international stability is, paradoxically, the prime source of American vulnerability.” – page 28 ”The most troubling conclusion for foreign policy as a whole is that reducing the odds of attacks in the United States might require pulling back from involvement in some foreign conflicts.Biological weapons should now be the most serious concern, with nuclear weapons second and chemicals a distant third.” – page 27 ”The importance of the different types among WMD has shifted.233.īetts, Richard, “ The New Threat of Mass Destruction” Foreign Affairs.
When Congress invests an agency with enforcement and investigatory authority, it is not necessary to identify explicitly each and every technique that may be used in the course of executing the statutory mission.’” P. Supreme noted that, ‘Congress has vested in EPA certain investigatory and enforcement authority, without spelling out precisely how this authority was to be exercised in all the myriad circumstances that might arise in monitoring matters relating to clean air and water standards. “In an unsuccessful challenge to a warrantless aerial surveillance technique, the U.S.UNITED STATES, BY AND THROUGH ADMINISTRATOR, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, No. Supreme Court of the United States, DOW CHEMICAL CO. Developmental Milestones/Developments to Date:
0 kommentar(er)
